|
Is the Inergetix-CoRe system easier to use than other systems?
Should I consider buying the Inergetix-CoRe System if I have no background education in natural health?
How does the practitioner affect the results in Inergetix-CoRe?
There is a great range in Rife devices, but which is really reliable? Do you have any experience in that? The disadvantage with the Rife is that you are not exactly sure which frequencies are most suitable.
I need to improve the reliability of testing methods for dental foci (and maxillaries and so on, but especially dental!). I've used Vega Expert but I haven't much confidence. Some friends of mine who use EAV told me about their problems with it. There are a lot of devices on the market (BEST, AVATAR, ACUPRO, etc), but all seem a new version of the old model.
In Germany Dr Lechner proposes ScaSys based on Scalar wave, what do you think about it?
I read about two methods which seem interesting: Thermography (CRT 2000) and Acuvision. The first is based on skin temperature measurement after thermal stress, the second on degree of luminescence from an acupoint without pressure or other influence (sweat, etc). The first is expensive ($14000). What is your opinion and what do you suggest?
I'd like to better understand if bioresonance working with QX (AutoTrivector, signal sending from tray, etc) is only "informational", therefore not giving the "more physical signals" (energetic) that are sometimes essential for successful therapy.
Could I improve my therapeutic results with a good bioresonance device? On the market there are systems which are too expensive. I asked and received from AMS information about Medisend Super built up according to Dr Ludwig. It seems interesting although inferior to Medisend SuperII. However, Medisend Super seems to allow several therapies (with isodes, nosodes, endogenous signals) which are useful for allergy, particular diseases, etc. I've some doubt because in the booklet I read: "single frequency setting can be patient-specific optimized (EAV, Kinesiology)". What is your opinion and advice? My aim is to have a tool for several uses.
I have also experienced a Mora EAV and seen and heard the dropping away of electrical readings on a consistent basis. How can that happen if it is just background noise? I also experienced the old Scientology E-meter and saw definite and I should say "unreasonable" deflections as responses to a line of questioning. Again how does that operate if it is just background?
I agree if your equipment can do as much as the QXCI, why the [much higher price of the QXCI]? On the other hand, patients here like to feel that the treatment is something real, even if they can't feel anything. A lot of straps makes you feel ‘treated’.
Does Inergetix-CoRe do therapies [balance] the same way the QXCI does?
Is the Inergetix-CoRe System really reliable at least like QXCI concerning statistical accuracy on testing and in its ability to send therapeutic information?
Is the treatment with the Inergetix-CoRe System faster and more successful? For example, you have a patient with multiple food allergies, parasites, dental foci plus candida and perhaps burdens from an old flu infection and drugs used in excess.
Any system should give diagnostic results which are real and it would be even better if it ranked them by their importance. And even better if it had protocols available to treat anything that shows up and monitored the progress while you do this. No mistake, Bicom can do this and older radionic systems could do this also. What about the Inergetix-CoRe System?
The MoRa is a bio-resonance device and is for me only to understand by means of radionics. But why (for heavens sake) is the device full of electronics? Is the working principle eventually on the plane of information?
I can accept your views about reproducibility regarding bio-tensor and EAV techniques. However both techniques are quite reproducible if used by a trained practitioner and the results are always related to real health problems.
Q: Is the Inergetix-CoRe system easier to use than other systems?
A: Many users tell us that Inergetix-CoRe is simple to use and its simple graphics make it more pleasant to use than some other devices. The basic steps in making an informational analysis and balancing with the Inergetix-CoRe System are almost as easy as 1-2-3. After creating a client file (by entering and saving 4 pieces of information), in the Database window where you will run the analysis, you would simply:
1. Type in the symptoms
2. Select the group(s) of remedies you want to scan for resonance
3. Click Analyze.
When you have run enough analyses to understand the picture, then you will
1. Select the most resonant remedies from each group
2. Copy them into a remedy tray
3. Set up and run a balancing plan (which is a 2-step process if you want to balance immediately).
There are a couple of different ways to use the energetic side of the system; usually you will run one analysis as described above, then
1. Set the parameters for your search for resonant frequencies (depending on the mode, this step may not be necessary)
2. Select the frequencies you want to broadcast (in automatic mode, this step is not necessary)
3. Choose your settings for broadcasting
4. Start the broadcast.
back to top
Q: Should I consider buying the Inergetix-CoRe System if I have no background education in natural health?
A: The Inergetix-CoRe System is very easy to operate, however it has a database of several thousand remedies and items, divided into 400 groups, which come up during analysis. If you do not have any background in a natural health modality you will not be able to use all of its potential because you will not be able to understand the connections between the items that come up with significant values, an understanding which would help you to understand the client’s situation more fully. However, if you want a tool to help you learn, then the Inergetix-CoRe System is the best tool to help you learn about these connections. For the herbal and natural remedies that comprise the A-Z Natural remedies part of our standard database, the system comes with an invaluable reference work that, when used by those who do not know about herbs, invariably shows the connection of the item to the client's situation.
back to top
Q: How does the practitioner affect the results in Inergetix-CoRe?
A: In Inergetix-CoRe, there is a filter that filters out the influence of the practitioner - this comes from the patient data window, where you enter the information that the program uses to create the pattern of the client. In constitutional mode, the results reflect a 90% emphasis on the resonance between the client and the remedy (with 10% from the resonance between the remedy and the symptoms); in support/homeopathic mode, the ratio is the other way around - and with only 10% of the picture including the client filter, you have some practitioner influence. Kiran's comment on this was that the support mode is well-named because it really is quite homeopathic; in traditional homeopathy the practitioner is involved in the process of remedy selection. Inversion mode works the same way as homeopathic mode, because it reverses the pattern of the symptoms before searching for resonance. Apart from that, of course, the practitioner has an influence on the overall process, as he - perhaps along with the client - decides what course to take through the various groups, but in any one isolated analysis he is filtered out as described above.
back to top
Q: There is a great range in Rife devices, but which is really reliable? Do you have any experience in that? The disadvantage with the Rife is that you are not exactly sure which frequencies are most suitable.
A: You are right, the first problem with Rife therapy is to find the appropriate frequencies. The F-San attempts to find them by doing a sweep and then measuring changes of impedance, which works sometimes but not always. There can be many reasons why Rife therapy is not successful in some cases, obviously the first to me is that Rife is not the appropriate modality in the given case because the problem is not primarily on the energetic plane but one of the other three planes which are described elsewhere on this site. Another reason to me is that the very notion that a disease could be narrowed down to a single frequency is mistaken. Nevertheless Rife therapy is often successful, it’s just that we do not yet know enough about all the connections. As a simple Rife-Pad device, the F-Scan is probably at the moment the best engineered. Version 4 of the Inergetix-CoRe System has two modes that informationally determine which frequencies are related to the client and their condition, so that client-specific and symptom-specific frequencies can be found, and broadcast.
back to top
Q: I need to improve the reliability of testing methods for dental foci (and maxillaries and so on, but especially dental!). I've used Vega Expert but I haven't much confidence. Some friends of mine who use EAV told me about their problems with it. There are a lot of devices on the market (BEST, AVATAR, ACUPRO, etc), but all seem a new version of the old model.
A:BEST, AVATAR and ACUPRO are all based on the application of an electric point probe and thus the readings are depending on various factors, humidity of the skin, applied pressure, probe-size and shape, angle of application, how often a particular point has already been used for measurement and so on. Keeping all these parameters somewhat constant depends on much experience and can only be somewhat compensated for by the device using spring-mounting of the probe, humidity compensation, a pressure gauge and so on. However the single most important parameter is the speed of application of the probe; that is something the manufacturers do not tell you because there is no way to compensate for it via the device. For this reason I consider EAV to be subjective to a large extent and for that reason blind-testing studies with EAV have never shown convincing results. Having said all this I still consider EAV a valuable tool and a good adjunct diagnostic measure along with others; however a relatively inexpensive system will give just as good results as other systems, as it is in fact a modern version of the old pendulum.
back to top
Q: In Germany Dr Lechner proposes ScaSys based on Scalar wave, what do you think about it?
A: The ScaSys uses an electric loop that supposedly transmits remedy information to the client via scalar waves and the testing is then done with traditional kinesiology. What the company is not telling you is how they produce scalar waves, which certainly all high tech physicists would wish to discover as they are said to be space-invariant, which means they do not need any time to traverse space and they are not deflected by matter. This would certainly be the ideal carrier wave for any kind of mass media communications and if Dr. Lechner or others who say they have found a way to produce it and modulate it with some complex remedy information would give out their secrets they could get billions and would not have to earn their money so hard on the alternative health market!
back to top
Q: I read about two methods which seem interesting: Thermography (CRT 2000) and Acuvision. The first is based on skin temperature measurement after thermal stress, the second on degree of luminescence from an acupoint without pressure or other influence (sweat, etc). The first is expensive ($14000). What is your opinion and what do you suggest?
A: There have been many attempts to measure meridian points in an other than electric fashion, as everyone who is trying to work with electric probes objectively soon realizes that they are not physical measuring instruments in the regular sense. To use heat emanation (Thermography) is one way, to use Kirlian luminescence is another; both have similarly not proven to be reproducible, but maybe new technologies will prove to be. Also, for both technologies, no solid pool of experimental data has been collected for interpretation without ambiguity. My advice is to try out a given device and see if it is giving somewhat reproducible and intelligent results.
back to top
Q: I'd like to better understand if bioresonance working with QX (AutoTrivector, signal sending from tray, etc) is only "informational", therefore not giving the "more physical signals" (energetic) that are sometimes essential for successful therapy.
A: First of all the QXCI is not a bioresonance device as is claimed by the manufacturer; it has no circuitry to receive any data from the patient, it is not making a "handshake" with the patient as is said, it is not testing millions of parameters via an actual electric link with the patient. Opening the box will show anyone with only the slightest understanding of electrical circuitry that there are no functional electric circuits inside, but only an assortment of randomly selected parts. Yes, the lights are working, and they show only the status of the parallel interface of the computer, nothing more. The harness is connected directly with the output of a regular soundcard speaker and therefore one can measure some random electrical signal on it if one takes an oscilloscope; however if one runs for example the "Rife-Function" of the program, no corresponding frequencies will be measured at the harness. Therefore the QXCI is a well-marketed, age-old radionics device with a colorful graphic surface.
back to top
Q: Could I improve my therapeutic results with a good bioresonance device? On the market there are systems which are too expensive. I asked and received from AMS information about Medisend Super built up according to Dr Ludwig. It seems interesting although inferior to Medisend SuperII. However, Medisend Super seems to allow several therapies (with isodes, nosodes, endogenous signals) which are useful for allergy, particular diseases, etc. I've some doubt because in the booklet I read: "single frequency setting can be patient-specific optimized (EAV, Kinesiology)". What is your opinion and advice? My aim is to have a tool for several uses.
A: Bioresonance, different from pure radionics (or the QXCI), has a working circuitry that inverts incoming signals from the client and outputs them back to him. The idea came about when Morell and Rasche, two people from Germany, came in contact with Scientology and Ron Hubbard's E-Meter and thought about ways to improve it; this is how MOrell-RAsche-Therapy (MORA-Therapy) was born; others like BICOM, AMS, Kindling a.s.o. came later as copycats. Bioresonance has certainly helped a lot of people, however the question of whether this is due to an informational effect or if complex client information can in fact be inverted by a $10 circuitry, which basically simply makes a phase shift, cannot be answered; however I have heard from practitioners that they got results which were just as good when they forgot to turn on the power or to plug in one of the electrodes.
back to top
Q: I have also experienced a Mora EAV and seen and heard the dropping away of electrical readings on a consistent basis. How can that happen if it is just background noise? I also experienced the old Scientology E-meter and saw definite and I should say "unreasonable" deflections as responses to a line of questioning. Again how does that operate if it is just background?
A: When I told you that what are commonly called remedy signatures are considered to be buried in the electrical noise below the sensitivity level of contemporary measuring instruments, I was not talking about the impedance measurements of EAV. These impedances are unquestionable and can be done with any $20 voltmeter bought at the local hardware store. However, as you can try for yourself and as I have described in more detail elsewhere on this site, the readings can quite easily be changed consciously or sub-consciously by the speed and pressure of application of the probe; therefore they can act just like a pendulum for diagnosing.
back to top
Q: I agree if your equipment can do as much as the QXCI, why the [much higher price of the QXCI]? On the other hand, patients here like to feel that the treatment is something real, even if they can't feel anything. A lot of straps makes you feel ‘treated’.
A: With the older versions of Inergetix-CoRe, which did not have hardware for energetic balancing, we used to provide a wrist electrode that was symbolic only. Now, with the energetic hardware, we have two gold-plated hand electrodes (and a gold-plated foot electrode) that the client can hold if the user feels that they will be reassured by them – again however, they will be only symbolic during the evaluation (but of course not symbolic during the electric frequency balancing). Additionally, there is a client intake form with questions on the client’s lifestyle and habits, which the practitioner can use for building rapport if he feels it will help. The information on this form is not used by the Inergetix-CoRe System during the evaluation, but it can be useful for the practitioner.
back to top
Q: Does Inergetix-CoRe do therapies [balance] the same way the QXCI does?
A: Yes. In informational balancing, a symbolic representation is created of the object you want to balance, be it an organ, an emotion, a disease or a whole person. This symbolic object is then mathematically synchronized with a symbolic representation of a remedy; this works a change on the informational level and is helpful if the problem originates on the informational level. The user is not seeing any of this process, which is happening in the background, but instead the QXCI is giving you a graphical animation of the process which is just a visual representation but has nothing to do with the actual functioning. The Inergetix-CoRe System leaves this out and it is instead easier to operate and more reproducible.
back to top
Q: Is the Inergetix-CoRe System really reliable at least like QXCI concerning statistical accuracy on testing and in its ability to send therapeutic information?
A: The Inergetix-CoRe System is a lot more reproducible in the default long-term mode than the QXCI is, however I would not totally discard CoRe’s short-term mode, which is equivalent to that used by regular ‘radionics’ devices and which I call number evaluation; I even use it in cases which are more acute and changeable in nature; I usually compare the Inergetix-CoRe default mode to a more ‘constitutional’, meaning long-term, analysis, compared to the more changeable and momentary view of a regular radionic analysis. As you see, in Inergetix-CoRe you have the choice of seeing both by selecting them from the Database window.
The difference of effectiveness in broadcasting (synchronizing) between Inergetix-CoRe and other informational instruments has not been established objectively.
Please also remember that radionics and informational therapy are a diagnostic aid in the first place; informational balancing will only give results if the primary cause for the problem is on the information level, but then it is very effective and can usually give immediate results, which in that form cannot be achieved by any other modality.
back to top
Q: Is the treatment with the Inergetix-CoRe System faster and more successful? For example, you have a patient with multiple food allergies, parasites, dental foci plus candida and perhaps burdens from an old flu infection and drugs used in excess.
A: I used to use EDS/EAV parallel with Inergetix-CoRe to compare and confirm results and I know they are very complementary. For years for example I used a VEGA Quicktest to scan hundreds of remedies via EAV. I do not do that anymore. Imagine, how could you even come close to testing 20,000 remedies with EAV – and this is how many there are available with the standard Inergetix-CoRe database.
Also instead of poking a client’s fingers hundreds of times with the point probe, now you have time to discuss the results which come up on the screen.
back to top
Q: Any system should give diagnostic results which are real and it would be even better if it ranked them by their importance. And even better if it had protocols available to treat anything that shows up and monitored the progress while you do this. No mistake, Bicom can do this and older radionic systems could do this also. What about the Inergetix-CoRe System?
A: You say a system "should give diagnostic results which are real". For some people the question of what is real and what is not is a very simple one; for me however, in respect to clients and illness, it is not so clear. To me, concepts like you mentioned - dental foci, parasites, food intolerances, multiple allergies, are more possible gateways to understanding the real situation of the client, any one or any combination of the above can do that.
Yes, the Inergetix-CoRe System, like all the others, will alert you to these kinds of things and 20,000 more. Viewed together and in conjunction with the filter function of the Inergetix-CoRe System used by a skilled practitioner this will give enormous insight into the client’s situation. But taken on face value alone, and isolated from the rest, this can lead you just as quickly into dead ends.
At seminars, for example, I just ask volunteers to be connected to the Inergetix-CoRe System and in front of the audience I tell them what I see, from the results, about their situation, just to get the amazement effect.
However in real practice I do a good anamnesis first and then use the Inergetix-CoRe System to clarify and connect the dots. This altogether usually takes me about an hour.
Different than Bicom and EAV, informational devices like the Inergetix-CoRe System can do a broadcast which is often surprisingly effective if the cause of the illness is on the informational level.
Computerized informational devices are usually quite a challenge for some people who are used to doing just EAV/EDS testing or testing with something like kinesiology or pendulum, because they confront the user with such a number of possible healing remedies and modalities that they either face the challenge by constantly trying to learn more or just give up.
When you do any form of one-by-one testing as you do in EDS, you have only a very limited number of things you can test, things you have put together more or less from your personal preferences – so test results are never as surprising as when you use a system like the Inergetix-CoRe – have you for example tested all the remedies that come up with the Inergetix-CoRe for something like depression? With the Inergetix-CoRe the few ‘top’ items you do see are usually only a fraction of perhaps several hundred items in the group(s) selected.
The CoRe System is a hybrid of an informational and energetic balancing system and a traditional knowledge base for natural medicine. You can do informational scans of the whole database just as you can in other systems like the QXCI or Quantec, or you can limit your scan and analysis to a given symptom or disease so that you will only rank remedies that have indicated that they are useful in this respect.
back to top
Q: The MoRa is a bio-resonance device and is for me only to understand by means of radionics. But why (for heavens sake) is the device full of electronics? Is the working principle eventually on the plane of information?
A: One definition of radionics is that "It is the science of Symbols". So radionics works more or less scientifically with symbols to influence physical things or people or illnesses. MoRa was first designed in the seventies when everyone was full of excitement about the limitless possibilities of electronics, but in fact Morell and Rasche rediscovered radionics in a new medium, that of electronic circuitry. By symbolically redesigning a healing process by means of electronic flow plans they could successfully treat those illnesses that were accessible with this particular symbol. The symbol Mora uses is that of "Inversion", represented electronically by a phase-shifting electronic component which basically inverts the incoming signal. This approach will work for all diseases that are primarily on the informational plane and that need an inversion process, such as for example old memories of trauma or toxins in the body which already physically have been removed but have still left an informational imprint. However this way is also very limited because electronics has only a limited number of symbolic solutions for the great variety of disease conditions. Software is a much more flexible medium, so for example the Inergetix-CoRe System allows you to choose not only "Inversion" but also for example "Strengthening", "Balancing", and "Support" which are very different to "inversion" which is actually the common allopathic approach.
back to top
Q: I can accept your views about reproducibility regarding bio-tensor and EAV techniques. However both techniques are quite reproducible if used by a trained practitioner and the results are always related to real health problems.
A: I know that they are as reproducible as you allow them/want them to be. For example Staufen Pharma in Germany, the biggest supplier of EAV test preparations, gives out a ranked list every year of the top 100 things EAV testers find. It changes every year only in so far as some new fashionable remedy or toxin-idea hit the market, the rest stays the same. If you are a person who prefers to be more reproducible you will find mostly the same 2 or 3 dozen things in your clients, to which you are accustomed or which your personal preferences dictate, not that this is false but you have to be aware of that fact.
back to top
*To avoid misinterpretation of words such as energy-medicine, informational-medicine, treat, cure, diagnose, illness, disease, remedy and spiritual healing please study our Vision and Mission page carefully. CoRe System users in the USA are required to read and accept these interpretations.
© 2007-2008, Inergetix, Inc. All Rights Reserved
|
Support
